Laboratory Evaluation of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Distribution and Diagnosis in Clinical Samples

Authors

  • Maesm Ahmed Mohamed Ben Hsin Department of Laboratory, College of Sciences and Medical Technology Tripoli, Libya Author
  • Nagla T. T. Arab Department of Laboratory, College of Sciences and Medical Technology Tripoli, Libya Author
  • Hamza Ahmed Mohammad Emsaed Libyan Authority for Scientific Research Author
  • Ahmed Ramadan Abujarida Department of Laboratory, The higher institute of Sciences and Technology Mesallata, Mesallata, Libya Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65421/jshd.v1i2.11

Keywords:

Bacterial infections, Clear dominance, Children, urine samples, Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Abstract

This study analyzed the prevalence and characteristics of bacterial infections, focusing on Pseudomonas aeruginosa, using 58 clinical samples from Al-Jalaa Hospital and Al-Sharq Laboratory. The results revealed a clear dominance of Pseudomonas bacteria, which were isolated from 50 of the 58 total samples, accounting for 86.21% of the cases. Younger age groups were the most affected, with children aged 6-10 years showing the highest proportion of cases (24.0%). A higher prevalence was also observed among females, who accounted for 44 of the 50 positive cases (88.0%). Additionally, urine samples were the most frequently collected specimen type, making up 37.9% of the total samples. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed on 50 clinical isolates of Pseudomonas. The results showed that Colistin was the most effective antibiotic with 96% susceptibility, followed by Amikacin (80%) and Imipenem (60%). In contrast, high resistance rates were observed against Ceftazidime (52%), Ciprofloxacin (50%), and particularly Piperacillin (86%), highlighting the limited effectiveness of these agents for empirical therapy

Downloads

Published

2025-11-26

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Laboratory Evaluation of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Distribution and Diagnosis in Clinical Samples . (2025). Journal of Scientific and Human Dimensions, 1(2), 24-41. https://doi.org/10.65421/jshd.v1i2.11