The Impact of Misconceptions About Physical Performance on the Level of Psychological Hesitation Among Libyan Football League Referees

Abstract

The current research aimed to investigate the impact of erroneous beliefs (superstitious thinking) regarding physical performance as a predictor of psychological hesitation levels among Libyan Football League referees, while identifying the correlational nature and significant differences between these variables. To achieve this, the researcher employed a descriptive-analytical and correlational methodology. The primary sample, selected via a comprehensive census method, consisted of (81) referees (International, First, and Second-class). Data collection tools included a demographic data sheet along with scales for erroneous beliefs and psychological hesitation, following the verification of their psychometric properties.

Results revealed that referees generally possess a low level of erroneous beliefs, reflecting a "cognitive immunity" developed through accumulated field experience. Despite this low level, the study uncovered a strong, statistically significant positive correlation between the two variables (R = 0.684). Erroneous beliefs demonstrated a high explanatory power in predicting psychological hesitation, accounting for 46.8% of the total variance (R2 = 0.468). Furthermore, significant differences were observed; psychological hesitation escalated sharply among referees with high levels of erroneous beliefs (M = 158.42) compared to those with lower levels (M = 92.15). This confirms that reliance on "dysfunctional mental software"-such as illusory rituals- depletes psychological energy and hinders accurate situational processing. Consequently, the research recommends integrating cognitive distortion deconstruction units into referee training programs and adopting standardized scales as periodic preventive diagnostic tools, alongside activating sports psychological counseling offices.